Thursday, September 3, 2020

Health Care Policies Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Social insurance Policies - Assignment Example Abusive behavior at home act shields one against one from misuse. Aggressive behavior at home is practices that one has with the point of accomplishing control of different accomplices. Abusive behavior at home in a general public can incorporate a few exercises that expect one to be shielded from. Misuse can incorporate physical assaults which can come through sexual connections that are constrained, provocation and obnoxious attack with disparaging remarks, dangers, making an unsettling influence at one's region, keeping an eye on one and youngster misuse. At the point when these exercises happen in a spot, there are activities and arrangements that can be utilized to make a move for those that aroma the demonstrations. Abusive behavior at home can be controlled in various manners in various sorts of courts. In criminal courts, the state can summon the abuser (Greer, 2009). Potential violations that can be dealt with in these circumstances incorporate homicide, assault, hijacking, ambush and senior maltreatment. In common courts, one can address the issues that happen because of badgering and cash harms. In the court, one can be considered answerable for individual injury and lewd behavior. Separation and family courts are additionally used to shield from aggressive behavior at home. Court Order of Protection is a strategy that has been put ensures again aggressive behavior at home. The arrangement makes the unique need of one that has been manhandled to be tended to. The strategy can arrange the abuser to avoid the one mishandled and forestall contact through telephone email or mail (Greer, 2009). For the strategy to be applied there must be verification that there was the aim of brutality. These are lawful rights that administer multiplication. Multiplication rights incorporate the option to anti-conception medication, right to protected and lawful premature birth, opportunity of contraception and sanitization and furthermore the option to get to regenerative social insurance of good quality. Conceptive rights likewise offer one the chance to get to training on issues that worry sex and the contaminations that happen.

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Did Our Ancestors Live in Harmony with the Environment? :: Environment Environmental Pollution Preservation

Did Our Ancestors Live in Harmony with the Environment? Apparently people are entering a phase in their aggregate lives in which we are starting to see that we can without much of a stretch modify our surroundings definitely. Some are as yet partitioned about how they feel about this, feeling things can't in any way, shape or form be as awful as the numerous Judgment day situations painted by both logical and strict specialists. What's more, there are other people who are incredibly stressed over our aggregate effect on nature, and dread that it might as of now be past the point of no return for people, and the world will before long change adequately enough to make proceeded with human endurance on this planet extremely troublesome. From the two kinds of individuals, the inquiry emerges, Was there ever when people lived such that was pretty much in congruity with nature? A key component in this conversation is the utilization of innovation, inexactly characterized as anything outside of characteristic organic capacities that is controlled and used to get a goal. To look for when our predecessors may have lived all the more ecologically deliberately, one needs proof, and for this situation, it is by and large idea that the main genuine proof to be found is through fossils of things made and utilized by these individuals of such a long time ago. In any case, how far back in time would we say we are discussing? What's more, is there some other sort of proof that may reveal a touch of insight into how individuals lived in those occasions? It is commonly recognized that beginning with our progenitor Homo erectus, people started to utilize their hands to make apparatuses (Ponting, 18). This information depends on dating procedures of archeological discoveries, for example, skeletons and early devices, and the harsh gauge of the presence of this apparatus utilizing human is around 2 million years prior. On the off chance that it isn't self-evident, that is quite a while. Indeed, even over the most recent 4000 years, the measure of progress that human culture and society has experienced is huge, and at any rate that much is verifiably archived by probably a few societies in fluctuating interims. However, to bounce right back to 2 million years includes a far jump to be sure. There isn't a lot of proof that discloses to us anything about social orders so far back in time. There are a few bones and stones, yet nothing that truly separates each one of those a huge number of years into any genuine comprehension of the social orders of that period.

Friday, August 21, 2020

Intellectual Property and Copyright Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words

Licensed innovation and Copyright - Case Study Example Joe who has no clue what he needs to do with the exception of more medications and more young ladies and is effectively convinced to join his sibling's new band Larger. Joe is too lethargic to even consider doing anything over what his sibling lets him know. Sam chose the bassist and drummer will be his two old mates - who may not be the best performers on the planet however they have little else going on and are if nothing else are faithful. So Sam gets Jeff Williams his old fashioned companion on bass and Gary Cobbler on drums. Most definitely they will accomplish for the time being. They begin practicing at a storm cellar studio in King's Cross called The Basement where Sam frequently functions as a studio hand and roadie to groups on visit. The Basement let Sam utilize the studio to make a 5 track demo on the premise that if any cash comes in they will get paid, despite the fact that Steve the Basement's proprietor additionally makes reference to abrogates in the event that they get renowned - Sam instructs him to get lost yet they have a beverage on it any way. Sam gets Larger on the rundown to play the unsigned groups night at the music business gathering ' In The City' in Manchester in September 1996. They play a shambolic set however Joe establishes a connection with a few of the A n R men and furthermore a few administration organizations and booking specialists show genuine intrigue. Sam does all the gatherings and never welcomes the other musicians to go along except if the A n R individuals need to meet them. Sam additionally meets a few administration individuals. At last Sam picks an administrator and tells the others - the administration organization is called Strong Management and is fronted by eighties overseeing legend John Coldheart. Joe thinks he is a 'tosser' however offers no further remark. Coldheart gets the band an arrangement with a significant mark and gets the band to utilize his legal counselor Alex Shark who is an accomplice at the firm Sharks and Co. Alex Shark tells the band the arrangement is extraordinary and says he will disclose everything to them at the marking party at the record organization Hit Records Inc. The musicians get totally put at the gathering and Alex thinks that its difficult to keep them quiet long enough to peruse the arrangement - they all sign the administrative work they are given. Bigger's first collection 'The Abusers Manifesto' goes straight in at number one and sells 5 million duplicates around the world. Sam sacks Jeff Williams and Gary Cobbler. Jeff whines and Sam sends him a check for 10,000 with a letter saying it is a 'pay off' - Sam cc the letter to Alex Shark and John Coldheart. Sam has all the composing credits and gets all the distributing cash and does a million pound distributing manage a significant distributer. Joe weds a very model and his face is all over. Coldheart the executives become Larger administration in organization with Sam. Things being what they are, there is a condition in the first record organization contract saying that Sam and Joe own the name Larger. The agreement additionally names Sam and Joe as key individuals, with a few key individuals' privileges. 1) What activity can Jeff Williams and Gary Cobbler bring against Sam 2) What activity would they be able to bring against Alex Shark and his organization 3) What activity would they be able to bring against John Coldheart 4) Can you recommend different manners by which this band could have pushed ahead and how a portion of these issues could have been kept away from Answer So as to think of the response to the issues engaged with the inquiry, let us first take an examination on the standard practices in music business at the United Kingdom, and the applicable law to copyright. The Music Contract Shaping a band

Tuesday, June 16, 2020

Top Tips for Writing an Academic Report

Top Tips for Writing an Academic Report Academic reports are written for a clear purpose, which is to communicate the findings of a project to a particular audience (e.g. the general public, senior management, or a client). Unlike essays, reports are much more structured, which allows the readers to find what they want easily and quickly. However, just like any other type of academic paper, writing a report may be very challenging. But no worries, we have prepared several useful tips that will help you in writing your next academic report. Know your task You should know exactly what your report is about before you plan your research. Carefully examine all the information you have been provided about the report. Don’t rush things at this stage as it may take much more time to make changes to your report than doing what is required from the very beginning. Plan your research Decide on what information is required to write your report. You may need to do background reading in the first place to get a better understanding of the current situation in the industry of your interest. You should also decide on what documents and articles you will need to carry out the investigation. Search for information Read written material such as books, articles, and other reports to find the information you need. There are plenty of useful resources for students where you can find this information, starting from searching engines to databases with economic, social, and market data. Create a structure Based on your research findings and assignment requirements, you now can create an overall structure of your report. In addition, take into consideration such aspects as the length of the report, the degree of its formality, and its type when deciding on the structure. Analyse your findings Analyse the data you collected and interpret the obtained findings in a structured and logical manner. Avoid overstating your argument if the significance of your findings is not deep enough. Otherwise, there is a risk of getting a lower mark for the report. Make recommendations Recommendations are seen as the potential solution to the research problem, so make sure your recommendations are based on what you have found. Make your recommendations detailed so the reader knows exactly what should be done and who is responsible. Writing the report, and final checks Proofread your report and make it ready for the final submission. An obvious tip, but youll be surprised how many students surpass the proofreading just to get it submitted. This can cost you simple marks so we always recommend proofreading your work. If you cant bring yourself to do it, ask a friend or family member to proofread it for you this can help you to spot simple mistakes that you may have missed.

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

A Postmodernist/Posthumanist Reading of Kazuo Ishiguro’s,...

A Postmodernist/Posthumanist reading of Kazuo Ishiguro’s, Never Let Me Go using Fredric Jameson’s theory of Postmodernism and Late Capitalism. Posthumanism neologism is used to describe what comes after humanism and the question of what it means to be human. It is often and most frequently used to describe a dystopian life form that is created and crafted by humans themselves. Posthumanism is not to be confused with postmodernism, although their paths do cross intrinsically throughout this essay. The concept of posthumanism is not as modern as one may think and is displayed in Mary Shelley’s 1818 novel Frankenstein as a window into the advanced discoveries of nineteenth century science, and what can result from trying to play the role of†¦show more content†¦The idea of them being so human, so perfect juxtaposes the fact that they are copies of humans, meaning they are not simulacrum, making it all the more difficult for bonding as they are so nearly human. This confusion can be highlighted when the character of Ruth declares â€Å"She’s scared of us† when referring to a higher and human power within their school. By being so radically human like, the clones in turn become de-humanised. Alongside this similarity, Ishiguro’s novel actually reiterates Jameson’s point about Edvard Munch’s painting, ‘The Scream’. He states that â€Å"it seems evident that The Scream subtly but elaborately disconnects its own aesthetic of expression, all the while remaining imprisoned within it.† This idea of perfection in terms of the clones being ‘perfect’ examples or more so, replicas of humans comes with how at the very beginning of the story, the children are given an assembly on no smoking, amongst other perceivable harms that may prevent them from fulfilling their desired ultimate duty of ‘donations’. As previously mentioned, the hypothesis of the clones in Never Let Me Go being a form of Plato’s ‘Simulacrum’ is discarded due to the clones being from an original copy. In the utopian view of the concept of the medical marvel in the novel, it would be perceived to be the route in which to take regarding

Minister of Pensions and Insurance System †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Minister of Pensions and Insurance System. Answer: Introduction: In the case of Pipe Industries Ltd v Occidental Life Nominees Pty Ltd[1] it had been stated by the court that when an act is done in the course of employment by an employee, the act is binding upon the employer even if the act had not been authorized by him. Thus through the provisions of this case it is clear that if it is provided that a person A is an employee of a person B, than any act which is done by A during the course of employment would bind B in a way as if the act has been done by B. The injured party has the right to claim compensation from B where the negligence has been committed by A[2]. At common law whether a person is an employee or not is determined by putting in place particular legal tests which have been provided through and used by various cases. The cases and the test which have been provided by them in relation to the determination of employment status of a person are as follows. Control test- The control test had originated from a landmark case in employment law which is -- Yewens v Noakes[3]. In this case the control test had been initiated by the court. It had been stated by the court in this case that the extent of control which a person has in relation to the work of other is used to determine whether the person in a contractor or an employee. The more the degree of control the employer has the likelier it is that the person employer for doing the work is an employee. Conversely if the person has less degree of control over the work done by the other the other person is likely to be a contractor. However in the case of Cassidy v Ministry of Health[4] the court ruled that merely establishing control does not make a person an employee of the other. Thus the case provided another test which is called the business integration test. The court in this case stated that the more the work is integrated into the business the more likely the person would be an employee. In the case of Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance[5] the court ruled that a single test cannot be used to determine whether a person is an employee or a contractor. Various elements needs to be analyzed together to determine the employment status of the person. This test is known as the Multiple factor test. According to the principles of the test in order to ensure that a person in an employee or an independent contractor a three step analysis needs to be applied. In the first step it has to be analyzed that whether the person had the duty of providing personal services to the employer. In the second step the degree of control which the employer has on the person is analyzed. In the final stage it has to be established that all terms of the contract are in accordance to the contract for service and not for contract of services[6]. In the case of Digby v The Compass Institute Inc and Anor[7] it had been ruled by the court that the employer is liable the injury caused to the employees during the course of employment where the employer has failed to exercise reasonable care to protect the employees from such injuries[8]. Further it has been stated in the court of Scott v Jackson Garden Landscape Supplies Pty Ltd[9] that the employer cannot be held liable for the injury which has been caused to the employee where proper measures had been taken by the employer to avoid such injury such as a cleaning system being present in this case. As defined by Holland, Burnett and Millington (2015) vicarious liability which is also associated to the Latin phrase respondeat superior, is the rule through which a person or entity is held responsible for the acts which have been done by any other person[10]. The rule is most commonly applied in the relationship between an employee and employer. The provisions have also been discussed in the case of Prince Alfred College Incorporated v ADC[11]. In the case of In Pioneer Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v Columbus Capital Pty Ltd[12] the judge stated that the employer is liable to be held responsible in relation to the conduct of the employee during his or her job. However for the act to be considered in the course of employment the act must have been directed or authorized by the employer or the employer must have to be associated with the conduct. However it is not within the scope of liability of the employer to be held responsible for actions which have not been done in the course of employment[13]. The elements of vicarious liability have to be present in order to make an employer liable for the conduct of the employee. The main element which needs to be established in order to prove vicarious liability is that the agreement which was present between the employee and the employer has a condition which requires the employee to work under the control of the employer. The action must however be within the scope of employment of the employee[14] In the given situation it has been stated that Tom has injured Annie and Fred has been injured due to the assumed negligence of Tom at the workplace owned by Will. In order to determine that whether Annie can claim compensation from Will, the provisions of Vicarious Liability along with the tests to determine employment has to be applied. If it is provided that Tom was an employee of Will and the act has been done in course of employment Annie would be entitled to claim compensation from Tom. It is been discussed through the above discussed cases that whether a person is an employee or an independent contractor is determined by deploying the control test, the integration test or the multiple factor test. It has only been discussed above that the above that the control or integration test are not alone capable of effectively determining employment. Thus the multi factor test has to be applied in the situation to analyze the relationship of Tom and Will. It has been provided through the scenario that Tom is a house painter and uses his own work van and equipments to do his job. He also has a registered business. Tom has been invited by Will to paint his shop. However for this he does not pay him cash but only beer bottles to which Tom agrees. Will has control over the way in which Tom will paint his shop as he directs him how to paint or what paints to use for the Job. The case of Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance provides a three step test in relation to determining employment status. In the first step it has to be analyzed that whether the person had the duty of providing personal services to the employer. In the second step the degree of control which the employer has on the person is analyzed. In the final stage it has to be established that all terms of the contract are in accordance to the contract for service and not for contract of services. Through the application of the first stage of the three fold test it can be stated that Tom has agreed to provide personal services to will in relation to painting his shop. Therefore the first stage of the three fold test is satisfied that Tom is an employee of Will. Through the application of the second stage of the three fold test the degree of control which the employer has on the person is analyzed. In the given situation it has been provided that Will controls the way in which Tom does his work and also directs him on what paints to use. Therefore it can be stated that Will has sufficient control over the way in which Tom works and the second stage of the three fold test is also satisfied in favor of the conclusion that Tom is an employee of Will. According to the third stage in the three fold test it needs to be proved that the terms of the contract between Tom and Will are predominantly in compliance with a contract for service rather than a contract for services. In the give n situation Tom is not provided weekly or monthly remuneration by Will and is only being paid on a one time basis in form of the beer bottles. This suggests that Thomas nearly an independent contractor as he is not provided with regular remuneration. In addition it has been provided that Tom uses his own tools and van for the purpose of completing the paint work. An employee is usually provided with tools and equipments to do the work by an employer. Therefore in the given situation it can be stated that the type of the contract between Will and Tom also indicates that Tom is an independent contractor and not an employee. The facts of the case study further provide that Tom has a registered business under which he operates the painting job. An employee cannot have a registered business of his own and has to work under the control of the employer. Thus this provision of the arrangement between Will and Tom also suggest that Tom is an independent contractor rather than an employee. Th us through the application of the above discussed multiple factor, 3 fold test it can be stated that Tom is not an employee of Will but rather an independent contractor. Conclusion Thus through the application of the case of Prince Alfred College Incorporated v ADC it can be stated that as Tom is not the employee of Will he cannot be held liable for the actions which has been committed by Tom. The provisions of vicarious liability are only applicable when it is proved that the person who has indulged induction is under the control of the employer. In this case study it has been further stated that Will did not authorize Tom to be drunk and go on a bicycle. The act has been committed by Tom against authorization provided by Will therefore in the given situation Will cannot be held liable for the accident which Annie and Tom has been indulged into. Any loss which has been faced by Annie can be claimed against Tom but not Will as there was any employment relationship between them. Through the analysis which has been discussed above I would like to advice Annie that she does not have any claim against Will as Tom was not in an employment relationship with Will when the accident took place. Bibliography Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 Craven, Judith A. "The Employment Relationship." NY Practice Guide: Business and Commercial 4 (2016). Digby v The Compass Institute Inc and Anor 30 October 2015 [QSC 308] Garrison, Joseph. "The New Restatement of Employment Law." Judicature 100 (2016): 30. Holland, J. A., Burnett, S., Millington, P. (2015). Employment Law 2016. Oxford University Press. Pioneer Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v Columbus Capital Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 78 Pipe Industries Ltd v Occidental Life Nominees Pty Ltd (1992) 10 ACLC 253 Prince Alfred College Incorporated v ADC [2016] HCA 37 Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance [1968] 2 QB 497 Rose, Emily. "David Cabrelli, Employment Law in Context." (2016): 105-106. Schipani, Cindy A., Frances J. Milliken, and Terry Morehead Dworkin. "The Impact of Employment Law and Practices on Business and Society: The Significance of Worker Voice." U. Pa. J. Bus. L. 19 (2016): 979. Scott v Jackson Garden Landscape Supplies Pty Ltd [2015] QDC 018 Walsh, D. J. (2015). Employment law for human resource practice. Nelson Education Yewen v Noakes [1880] 6 QBD 530

Tuesday, April 14, 2020

Essay Tips For Achieving A High GPA

Essay Tips For Achieving A High GPAWriting MBA essays can be challenging for students at times. In fact, writing such a major and complicated assignment can cause students to look for a short cut. To prevent this from happening, here are a few tips that students should take note of when they are considering using writing MBA essay samples.One tip for students is that they need to avoid using the word 'no' whenever possible when writing an MBA essay. Students should understand that the instructor is judging their essay, not vice versa. Using 'no' will automatically take the essay away from being a good one and may affect its grade if it is submitted in a real exam. The professor may choose to have the student rewrite the entire essay if they find it difficult to understand and utilize the points made by the author.The most common problem students face when writing their MBA essays is that they do not really understand the questions they are asked. The questions may come from either an instructor or from a reader. Often, an instructor wants to know why the student chose to specialize in their specific field of study. It is not uncommon for an instructor to ask the student to show the reasons for choosing a particular career path, but a reader may simply be asking to see examples of how the writer has applied themselves to a task.It is crucial that a student know how to correctly use the tools found in writing samples. One tool is the brainstorming technique. This strategy allows the student to envision how the entire essay might look before beginning to write. In doing so, the student will be able to focus more on their individual points.There are a number of methods available to improve a student's writing skills, but only a handful are truly beneficial. One of the most important ways to improve a student's writing skills is to avoid turning pages, especially when writing a long essay. Any student can tell you that when it comes to writing, you are tempted to ru sh through the process. This can result in a poorly written essay.The key to writing an MBA essay is to keep your thoughts organized and in order. Most students believe that they have all of the time in the world, but this often ends up proving to be a waste of time. The fewer steps a student has to take to complete their assignment, the better.Writing an MBA essay can be a very time consuming task. Because of this, it is imperative that students use the right strategy when writing. These techniques include taking notes with a pen and paper, utilizing a timer, writing with the English language software, and using the MLA style guide. It is also a good idea to keep up with a time management plan.Writing MBA essay samples can be a daunting task. However, by following these simple tips, a student can maximize their skills when writing their class assignments. It is best to stick to the basics and find a strategy that works for them.